Original – Olber’s Paradox argues against heliocentric theory
“Olber’s Paradox” posits that if the universe contained billions of stars like the Sun, the night sky would be entirely illuminated. As Edgar Allan Poe remarked, “If the sequence of stars were infinite, then the sky’s backdrop would exhibit a consistent brightness, because there would be no location in that background devoid of a star.” In reality, Olber’s “Paradox” is no more paradoxical than George Airy’s experiment was a “failure.” Both, in fact, serve as compelling refutations of the heliocentric spinning ball model.
Versus – Distant stars’ light can’t reach the Earth
The universe is about 13.8 billion years old. The light from distant stars simply hasn’t had time to reach us. Stars live and die, so not all of them shine at the same time. Also, the universe is expanding, and distant stars are moving away from us, making their light weaker.